|This centre is a member of The LSE Research Laboratory [RLAB]: CASE | CEE | CEP | FMG | SERC | STICERD||Cookies?|
Stephen P Jenkins,
Philippe Van Kerm,
Paper No' PEP 08: | Full paper
Save Reference as: BibTeX File | EndNote Import File
Keywords: individual income growth; pro-poor growth; progressive income growth; income mobility; mobility profile; British Household Panel Survey
JEL Classification: D31; D63; I32
Is hard copy/paper copy available? YES - Paper Copy Still In Print.
This Paper is published under the following series: Public Economics Programme Papers
Share this page: Google Bookmarks | Facebook | Twitter
Abstract:Assessments of whose income growth is the greatest and whose is the smallest are typically based on comparisons of income changes for income groups (e.g. rich versus poor) or income values (e.g. quantiles). However, income group and quantile composition changes over time because of income mobility. To summarize patterns of income growth while also tracking the fortunes of the same individuals, a longitudinal perspective is required. For this case, we develop dominance conditions and summary indices for comparisons of distributions of individual income growth, together with associated methods of estimation and inference. Using these methods and data from the British Household Panel Survey, we study individual income growth for periods between 1991 and 2005. We show that income growth was significantly more pro-poor in the early years of the Labour government than in earlier Conservative years.
Copyright © STICERD & LSE 2005 - 2014 | LSE, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE | Tel: +44(0)20 7955 6699 | Email: email@example.com | Site updated 25 October 2014