Skip to main content

IFS/STICERD/UCL Development Work in Progress Seminar

Welfare Eligibility Manipulation: Evidence From Georgia

Brendon McConnell (City), joint with Jaime Mill´an-Quijano

Thursday 27 June 2024 13:00 - 14:00

Many of our seminars and public events this year will continue as in person or as hybrid (online and in person) events. Please check our website listings and Twitter feed @STICERD_LSE for updates.

Unless otherwise specified, in-person seminars are open to the public.

Those unable to join the seminars in-person are welcome to participate via zoom if the event is hybrid.

About this event

Optimal targeting of social aid is a key issue in the design public policy. A key aspect of policy design is to create welfare systems that are manipulation-proof. We study demand side manipulation of a large, nationwide welfare program in Georgia. We use a rich tapestry of administrative and survey data to study a group of welfare recipient households, whose total baseline income is roughly 100USD per month. We start by documenting sizable jumps in household manipulation behavior at a key benefit discontinuity. We build a Becker (1968) style model of manipulation, which we use to inform our empirical strategy – a fuzzy regression discontinuity-instrumental variables design. Using administrative data, we find that those in households that engage in manipulation subsequently also engage more in the formal labor market, particularly men. We explore various channels for this finding. Using a marginal treatment effect analysis, we rule out that households are selecting on the unobserved (labor market) gains to manipulation. Manipulating households consequently have higher levels of income, from welfare and the labor market. Using survey data that we collect, we find that welfare-manipulating households spend the vast majority of their additional income on children, increasing expenditure on clothes and education. Given that adults in manipulating households are working more and have more income it is not clear a priori whether childhood outcomes will improve or not, given the countervailing inputs of parental time and money. With an early childhood skill production model in mind, we study a battery of outcomes for children and young people in the household. We find no significant changes for health outcomes for 0-5 year olds, nor do we find changes in educational engagement for teenagers. We do find an increase in university attendance for young people still living at home, particularly young women.

This seminar series is jointly organized by the IFS, STICERD, and UCL.

IFS/STICERD/UCL Development Economics Work In Progress seminars are held on Thursdays in term time at 13:00-14:00, at the IFS, unless specified otherwise.

Seminar organisers: Oriana Bandiera (STICERD, LSE), Imran Rasul (UCL), Britta Augsburg (IFS) and Jonathan Weigel (LSE).

For further information please contact Britta Augsburg:

Registration is required, via our mailing list:

Please use this link to subscribe or unsubscribe to the Development Economics Work In Progress seminars mailing list (developmentwip).