|This centre is a member of The LSE Research Laboratory [RLAB]: CASE | CVER | CEP | FMG | SERC | STICERD||Cookies?|
Geeta Gandhi Kingdon,
Paper No' DEDPS 01: | Full paper
Save Reference as: BibTeX File | EndNote Import File
Keywords: Returns to education; gender; labour force participation; earnings function; selectivity correction; India.
Is hard copy/paper copy available? NO - Paper Copy Out Of Print.
This Paper is published under the following series: Development Economics
Share this page: Google Bookmarks | Facebook | Twitter
Abstract:Labour market discrimination against women and parental discrimination against daughters are two of the most commonly cited explanations of the gender gap in education in developing countries. This study empirically tests the labour market explanation for India using household survey data collected in urban Uttar Pradesh in 1995. It estimates workforce participation functions and selectivity-corrected earnings fluctuations, and calculates the rates of return to education for the two sexes. Using the Blinder-Oaxaca method, the gross gender difference in earnings is decomposed into the part that is explained by men and women's differential characteristics and the part that is due to labour market discrimination. The results reveal that there is substantial omitted family background bias in the estimates of returns and that, contrary to received wisdom, the rates of returns to education rise by education level. The analysis suggests that, as well as overall labour girls face significantly lower economic rates of returns to education than boys.
Copyright © STICERD & LSE 2005 - 2022 | LSE, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE | Tel: +44(0)20 7955 6699 | Email: email@example.com | Site updated 19 August 2022