![]() | |
This centre is a member of The LSE Research Laboratory [RLAB]: CASE | CVER | CEP | FMG | SERC | STICERD | Cookies? |
| ||||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() |
Abstract for:
Torun Dewan,
David P. Myatt,
February 2007
Paper No' PEPP 24: | Full paper ![]() Save Reference as: ![]() ![]() Keywords: JEL Classification: Is hard copy/paper copy available? YES - Paper Copy Still In Print. This Paper is published under the following series: Share this page: ![]() ![]() ![]() Abstract:Party activists wish to (i) advocate the best policy and yet (ii) unify behind a common party line. An activist’s understanding of his environment is based on the speeches of party leaders. A leader’s influence, measured by the weight placed on her speech, increases with her judgement on policy (sense of direction) and her ability to convey ideas (clarity of communication). A leader with perfect clarity of communication enjoys greater influence than one with a perfect sense of direction. Activists can choose how much attention to pay to leaders. A necessary condition for a leader to monopolize the agenda is that she is the most coherent communicator. Sometimes leaders attract more attention by obfuscating their messages. A concern for party unity mitigates this incentive; when activists emphasize following the party line, they learn more about their environment. |
![]() |
||
Copyright © STICERD & LSE 2005 - 2022
| LSE, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE | Tel: +44(0)20 7955 6699 | Email: sticerd@lse.ac.uk | Site updated 15 August 2022
|