![]() | |
This centre is a member of The LSE Research Laboratory [RLAB]: CASE | CVER | CEP | FMG | SERC | STICERD | Cookies? |
| ||||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() |
Abstract for:
Christian List,
March 2007
Paper No' PEPP 26: | Full paper ![]() Save Reference as: ![]() ![]() Keywords: group deliberation; judgment aggregation, judgment transformation, belief revision JEL Classification: D70; D71 Is hard copy/paper copy available? YES - Paper Copy Still In Print. This Paper is published under the following series: Share this page: ![]() ![]() ![]() Abstract:While a large social-choice-theoretic literature discusses the aggregation of individual judgments into collective ones, there is relatively little formal work on the transformation of individual judgments in group deliberation. I develop a model of judgment transformation and prove a baseline impossibility result: Any judgment transformation function satisfying some initially plausible condition is the identity function, under which no opinion change occurs. I identify escape routes from this impossibility result and argue that successful group deliberation must be ‘holistic’: individuals cannot generally revise their judgments on a proposition based on judgments on that proposition alone but must take other propositions into account too. I discuss the significance of these findings for democratic theory. |
![]() |
||
Copyright © STICERD & LSE 2005 - 2022
| LSE, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE | Tel: +44(0)20 7955 6699 | Email: sticerd@lse.ac.uk | Site updated 15 August 2022
|