---

Many of our seminars and public events this year will continue as in person or as hybrid (online and in person) events.

Please check our website listings and Twitter feed @STICERD_LSE for updates.

Unless otherwise specified, in-person seminars are open to the public. Please ensure you have informed the event contact as early as possible.

Those unable to join the seminars in-person are welcome to participate via zoom if the event is hybrid.

---

About this event

Small donors are an important source of financing for political campaigns. Yet the literature focuses mainly on large donors and an influence motive. We propose a theory of consumption-motivated small donors with a key novelty: it centers on the interactions between small donors and the candidates' fund-raising strategy. We find that, through the candidates' actions, consumption-motivated small donors end up contributing more in close races, and to the campaign of the underdog. The candidates' actions also amplify the effects of donors' income on contributions. These patterns find support in the empirical literature. We then assess the impact of standard tools of campaign regulation: caps on individual contributions and on total spending. We find that, due to equilibrium effects, those tools may produce outcomes opposite to intended objectives. Finally, we identify a tax-and-subsidy scheme that mutes the effect of income while still allowing donors to voice the intensity of their support.